Royal Dutch Shell

(Redirected from Royal Dutch/Shell)

Royal Dutch Shell plc is a major energy company, one of the top four vertically integrated private sector oil/gas companies in the world (along with BP, ExxonMobil, and Total). Shell also has a significant petrochemicals business (Shell Chemicals) and an embryonic renewable energy sector developing wind and solar opportunities. Its corporate headquarters are in The Hague, Netherlands, with legal headquarters in London, United Kingdom.

Shell's revenues of $268 billion (2004) made it the fourth largest corporation in the world in 2004 and its profits of $18.18 billion made it the world's second most profitable business in terms of gross profits (calculations based on those numbers demonstrate a gross profit margin of 6.8%). Shell has operations in 140 countries in the world, the biggest of which is in the United States where its operating company is Shell Oil Company, which has its head office in Houston, Texas.

The Royal Dutch/Shell Group was created in 1907 when Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (legal name in Dutch, N.V. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij) and The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company plc merged their operations to compete against the then-giant American oil company, Standard Oil. Prior to unification, the group operated under a number of operating and shareholder agreements.

Royal Dutch Petroleum Company had been founded in 1890 by Jean Kessler, along with Henri Deterding and Hugo Loudon, when a Royal charter was granted by Queen Wilhelmina to a small oil exploration company known as "Royal Dutch."

The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company (the quotation marks are official) was a British company which dated back to 1897 and which had been founded by Marcus Samuel, and his brother, Samuel Samuel.

In 1919, Shell took control of the Mexican Eagle Petroleum Company and in 1921 formed Shell-Mex Limited which marketed products under the “Shell” and “Eagle” brands in the United Kingdom. In 1931, partly in response to the difficult economic conditions of the times, Shell-Mex merged their marketing operations in the UK (only) with those of British Petroleum to create Shell-Mex and BP Ltd a company that continued to trade until the brands separated again in 1975.

In November 2004 it was announced that that the Shell Group would move to a single capital structure, creating a new parent company to be named Royal Dutch Shell plc, incorporated in England and Wales, and with its principal listing on the London Stock Exchange but its headquarters in The Hague in the Netherlands. The unification was completed on 20 July 2005.

Under the old capital structure, Shell's ADRs were traded on the New York Stock Exchange under RD (Royal Dutch) and SC (Shell).

Shell is the world's third largest publicly traded Oil company based on revenues (After BP and ExxonMobil) and the second most profitable (after ExxonMobil) - (Fortune Global 500 2004)


Origin of the name and logo

A Shell petrol station sign in the UK A Shell gas station in the U.S. Shell Centre Building in London, UK

The origin of the brand name Shell is linked to the origins of The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company. In 1833, the founder's father, also Marcus Samuel, had himself founded an import-export business to sell seashells to London collectors. When collecting seashell specimens in the Caspian Sea area in 1892, the younger Samuel realised there was potential in exporting lamp oil from the region and commissioned the world's first purpose built oil tanker, the Murex, to enter this market. By 1907 the company had a fleet of oil tankers.

The Shell emblem is one of the most familiar commercial symbols in the world. Known as the "Pecten" after the sea shell on which its design is based (the giant scallop, Pecten maximus), the latest version of the logo was designed by Raymond Loewy and introduced in 1971.

Businesses

One of the original Seven Sisters, Royal Dutch/Shell is the world's third largest oil company by revenue, and a major player in the petrochemical industry and the solar energy business. Shell has five core businesses: Exploration and Production, Oil Products, Downstream Gas and Power, Chemicals and Renewables, and operates in more than 140 countries across the world.

Shell’s primary business was, and is, the management of a vertically integrated oil company. The development of technical and commercial expertise in all the stages of this vertical integration from the initial search for oil (exploration) through its harvesting (production), transportation, refining and finally trading and marketing established the core competencies on which the Group was founded. Similar competencies were required for Natural Gas which has become one of the most important businesses in which Shell is involved and which contributes a significant proportion of the companies’ profits. The Chemicals business, involving the production and marketing of a range of hydrocarbon derived chemicals products, was also a logical step downstream from the processing of crude oil in the refinery. Some of the Chemicals diversifications (e.g. Agrichemicals) have now been disposed of following major restructuring to Shell Chemicals over the past ten years, but there is still a large core chemicals business within the company.

Over the years Shell has occasionally sought to diversify away from its core oil, gas and chemicals businesses. These diversifications have included Nuclear Power (a short lived and costly Joint Venture with Gulf Oil in the USA); Coal (Shell Coal was for a time a significant player in mining and marketing); Metals (Shell acquired the Dutch metals-mining company Billiton in 1970) and Electricity generation (a joint Venture with Bechtel called Intergen). However none of these ventures were seen as successful and all have now been disposed of. In recent years Shell has moved tentatively into alternative Energy with investments in Solar Power; Wind Power; Hydrogen and Forestry. The Forestry business went the way of Nuclear, Coal,Metals and Electricity generation and was disposed of in 2003.


Texaco

In 2001, Shell purchased about 13,000 Texaco stations and several refineries in the United States to permit Texaco to merge with Chevron Corporation. Shell may exclusively use the Texaco brand in the U.S. through 2004, and non-exclusively through 2006.

Ownership

Prior to unification on 20 July 2005, the group was a dual listed company. The two holding companies were the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company of the Netherlands and The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company plc of the United Kingdom. These two companies jointly owned all the operating companies in the group, although some (e.g. Shell Canada) also have local shareholders and are traded on local stock markets. The Shell interest in subsidiaries is always divided 60/40 in favor of Royal Dutch. In many cases, subsidiary companies are held in partnership with other companies or governments.

Even now, likely for tax reasons, the company's shares are divided into two classes, A and B, representing the former Royal Dutch and Shell shares respectively.

Although, to meet company law in all countries, there were executive and non-executive nominated directors of both Royal Dutch and Shell Transport and Trading , the Group had in fact been run by an executive body called the "Committee of Managing Directors" (CMD), whose members were the (executive) Managing Directors of the two parent companies.

An original investor, the largest single shareholder of Royal Dutch Shell is the holding company owned by the Dutch Royal Family, which was set up by Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands.

Management

  • CEO: Jeroen van der Veer
  • CFO: Peter Voser

On 4 August 2005, the board of directors of Royal Dutch Shell plc announced the appointment of Jorma Ollila, currently Chairman and CEO of Nokia, to succeed Aad Jacobs as the company’s Non-Executive Chairman. The appointment will be effective from 1 June 2006. Commentators have pointed to the break of tradition in this appointment as Ollila will be the first Shell Chairman to be neither Dutch nor British.

Environmental and Reputational issues

Over the years Shell has been criticized by environmental and human rights groups for a number of their operations, especially in South Africa and Nigeria.

South Africa

In the 1970s and 1980s Shell was heavily criticised by anti Apartheid activists for continuing to carry out business in the Republic of South Africa. Annual General Meetings of the two Group holding companies were disrupted by protesters and Shell was also accused of sanctions breaking. Shell always argued that unlike other multinationals who withdrew (e.g. Mobil) it could be more of a force for good by staying in the country than by leaving.

Nigeria

Shell operates in Nigeria under the name Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC). Shell's involvement in Nigeria came to the fore after the execution of dissident Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight others. The political activist Ken Saro-Wiwa had implicated Shell during his “treason” trial by saying “…the ecological war that [Shell] has waged … will be called to question sooner than later and the …crime of the Company's dirty wars against the Ogoni people will also be punished.” Shell was also found to be providing money and supplies to the Nigerian military. When Saro-Wiwa was executed on trumped-up charges some of the world-wide condemnation of the act was aimed at Shell who by association was implicated.

Brent Spar

Shell was also challenged by Greenpeace for plans for subsea disposal of the Brent Spar, an old oil transport and hub station located in the North Sea, into the North Atlantic. Shell eventually agreed to disassemble it onshore in Norway, although Shell has always maintained (supported by third party advice) that its original plan to sink the platform was safer and better for the environment.

Canada

In Canada, Shell Canada settled a lawsuit in which an additive in their gasolines created problems on fuel gauges, especially in automobiles produced by DaimlerChrysler.

Ireland

In Ireland, Shell has drawn criticism by attempting to pipe unrefined gas from the Corrib Gas Field onshore and to refine it at a plant in north County Mayo. Natural gas is sometimes refined at source when offshore. The concerns lie in piping the gas, at high pressure, through inhabited areas. Five men were jailed in June 2005 for obstructing the construction of the pipeline through their lands.

Oil and Gas Reserves recategorisation

Shell drew fire in 2004 when it had to perform a major recategorization of its reserves, admitting that a significant share of reserves previously booked as proven did not fulfill the requirements for proof under the US regulatory provisions. The delayed Annual report and Accounts 2003 restated proven reserves reduced 6.648 mn USD in 2001 and reduced by 6.469 mn USD in 2002. This corresponds to roughly 13% of the previous proven reserves base. As a contributing factor, it was identified that in previous years the leading management's bonus payments were linked to the proven reserves base. This practice has since been discontinued. The reserves issue led to the dismissal of the Group Chairman Sir Philip Watts , and the departure of the CFO and other top executives.

Sustainable Development

On June 17th of 2004, Shell chairman Ronald Oxburgh made a statement to The Guardian that in the face of the threat of global warming he was "really very worried for the planet”. As a remedy he proposed the practice of carbon sequestration, which involves removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and burying it underground. "Sequestration is difficult, but if we don't have sequestration then I see very little hope for the world," he said. Lord Oxburgh's comments were consistent with Shell's commitment to Sustainable Development, a commitment which was a key part of the reputation building efforts that the Group undertook after Brent Spar.

Combination of Royal Dutch and Shell

On October 28, 2004, the company announced its proposal formally to merge Royal Dutch and "Shell" Transport and Trading into one entity, Royal Dutch Shell plc, to be "incorporated in the UK but headquartered and tax resident in the Netherlands." The new parent company's primary listing will be on the London Stock Exchange. On the 28th of June, 2005 investors in both "Shell Transport and Trading" and in "Royal Dutch" approved, at their Annual General Meetings, plans to merge the Group's dual-ownership structure and create a single company worth £120bn ($219bn).

The type of business structure now to be created was not possible under the relevant laws in 1907 when the Group was established, and the unique form of organisation that was then adopted by Shell, although durable, had come under criticism in recent years. Some critics thought that as the two parent companies had separate boards, with separate memberships, this meant that there was a certain amount of (undesirable) independence of each of the companies from the other. Others felt that the real power in Shell lay not with the two parent company boards at all but with the "Committee of Managing Directors" (CMD) which had no legal status, but nevertheless took all the key operational decisions. The new organisation structure follows a more conventional business model (e.g. in line with most other private sector oil companies) and most commentators have commented favourably on the change which they believe will establish a more transparent and accountable corporation. The CMD is abolished under this new structure, board meetings will be more executive in character and there will (now) only be one "Shell" AGM, in one location, every year.



This page about Royal Dutch Shell includes information from a Wikipedia article.
Additional articles about Royal Dutch Shell
News stories about Royal Dutch Shell
External links for Royal Dutch Shell
Videos for Royal Dutch Shell
Wikis about Royal Dutch Shell
Discussion Groups about Royal Dutch Shell
Blogs about Royal Dutch Shell
Images of Royal Dutch Shell


. IT insiders foresee the case to be a landmark ruling in what is a fiercely competitive market. The CMD is abolished under this new structure, board meetings will be more executive in character and there will (now) only be one "Shell" AGM, in one location, every year. Whilst proving that Intel holds a monopoly is simple (the company is reckoned to have an 80-90% share of the processor market) the debate over the 'scare and coercion' tactics supposedly employed by Intel is likely to be more protracted. in line with most other private sector oil companies) and most commentators have commented favourably on the change which they believe will establish a more transparent and accountable corporation. Amongst other accusations AMD alleged that Intel was unlawfully maintaining its monopoly through unfair business practices, such as drastically lower pricing for customers on the condition that Intel microprocessors were used exclusively in their systems. The new organisation structure follows a more conventional business model (e.g. In June of 2005 AMD, Intel's chief rival in the x86 microprocessor market, filed an antitrust claim against Intel and its Japanese subsidiary in a Delaware court.

Others felt that the real power in Shell lay not with the two parent company boards at all but with the "Committee of Managing Directors" (CMD) which had no legal status, but nevertheless took all the key operational decisions. the Green Line) and therefore is not considered disputed territory. Some critics thought that as the two parent companies had separate boards, with separate memberships, this meant that there was a certain amount of (undesirable) independence of each of the companies from the other. In fact, the city of Kiryat Gat (where the plant is located) lies well within the pre-1967 borders of Israel (a.k.a. The type of business structure now to be created was not possible under the relevant laws in 1907 when the Group was established, and the unique form of organisation that was then adopted by Shell, although durable, had come under criticism in recent years. Intel's massive manufacturing plant in Israel was built, with the help of heavy subsidies from Israel, on lands that Palestinians claim were confiscated from them. On the 28th of June, 2005 investors in both "Shell Transport and Trading" and in "Royal Dutch" approved, at their Annual General Meetings, plans to merge the Group's dual-ownership structure and create a single company worth £120bn ($219bn). As well, Intel is accused by Palestinians of collusion with Israel in supporting them in holding on to land confiscated illegally from the Palestinians.

On October 28, 2004, the company announced its proposal formally to merge Royal Dutch and "Shell" Transport and Trading into one entity, Royal Dutch Shell plc, to be "incorporated in the UK but headquartered and tax resident in the Netherlands." The new parent company's primary listing will be on the London Stock Exchange. In contrast with other hi-tech companies such as Microsoft, Intel does not allow discounted purchases of any kind by staff. Lord Oxburgh's comments were consistent with Shell's commitment to Sustainable Development, a commitment which was a key part of the reputation building efforts that the Group undertook after Brent Spar. However, Intel's working practices still face criticism,the company is notorious for paying extremly low wages and workplace bullying is common. "Sequestration is difficult, but if we don't have sequestration then I see very little hope for the world," he said. In addition, the company was named one of the 100 Best Companies for Working Mothers in 2004 by Working Mothers magazine. As a remedy he proposed the practice of carbon sequestration, which involves removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and burying it underground. They have maintained this rating in 2003 and 2004.

On June 17th of 2004, Shell chairman Ronald Oxburgh made a statement to The Guardian that in the face of the threat of global warming he was "really very worried for the planet”. Intel received a 100% rating on the first Corporate Equality Index released by the Human Rights Campaign in 2002. The reserves issue led to the dismissal of the Group Chairman Sir Philip Watts , and the departure of the CFO and other top executives. Its market capitalisation is about $154 billion (March 2005). This practice has since been discontinued. However, Intel was already trademarked by a hotel chain so they had to buy the rights for that name at the beginning. As a contributing factor, it was identified that in previous years the leading management's bonus payments were linked to the proven reserves base. They then used the name NM Electronics for almost a year, before deciding to call their company INTegrated ELectronics or "Intel" for short.

This corresponds to roughly 13% of the previous proven reserves base. But the name didn't sound good in electronics—noise being associated with bad interference. The delayed Annual report and Accounts 2003 restated proven reserves reduced 6.648 mn USD in 2001 and reduced by 6.469 mn USD in 2002. At its founding, Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce wanted to name their new company 'Moore Noyce'. Shell drew fire in 2004 when it had to perform a major recategorization of its reserves, admitting that a significant share of reserves previously booked as proven did not fulfill the requirements for proof under the US regulatory provisions. Grove stepped down as Chairman, but will be retained as a special advisor. Five men were jailed in June 2005 for obstructing the construction of the pipeline through their lands. The board of directors elected Otellini, and Barrett replaced Grove as chairman of the board.

The concerns lie in piping the gas, at high pressure, through inhabited areas. The changes were made effective May 18, 2005. Natural gas is sometimes refined at source when offshore. Barrett, in turn, will retire in 2005 and hand the reigns of the company over to Paul Otellini, who is also already the company president and was responsible for Intel's design win in the original IBM PC. In Ireland, Shell has drawn criticism by attempting to pipe unrefined gas from the Corrib Gas Field onshore and to refine it at a plant in north County Mayo. In 1997 Grove succeeded Moore as Chairman and Craig Barrett, already company president, took over. In Canada, Shell Canada settled a lawsuit in which an additive in their gasolines created problems on fuel gauges, especially in automobiles produced by DaimlerChrysler. Andy Grove became the company's President in 1979 to which he added the CEO title in 1987 when Moore became Chairman.

Shell eventually agreed to disassemble it onshore in Norway, although Shell has always maintained (supported by third party advice) that its original plan to sink the platform was safer and better for the environment. Robert Noyce was Intel's CEO at its founding in 1969, followed by co-founder Gordon Moore in 1975. Shell was also challenged by Greenpeace for plans for subsea disposal of the Brent Spar, an old oil transport and hub station located in the North Sea, into the North Atlantic. Legal experts predict the lawsuit will most likely drag out for a number of years since Intel's response indicates they are not likely to try and settle with AMD. When Saro-Wiwa was executed on trumped-up charges some of the world-wide condemnation of the act was aimed at Shell who by association was implicated. In its rebuttal, Intel layed out the skeleton of its legal defense which included a deconstruction of AMD's offensive strategy and levied the charge that AMD's long struggling market position is largely a result of bad business decisions and management incompetence including underinvestment in essential manufacturing capacity and over-reliance on outsourcing chip foundries.[2]. The political activist Ken Saro-Wiwa had implicated Shell during his “treason” trial by saying “…the ecological war that [Shell] has waged … will be called to question sooner than later and the …crime of the Company's dirty wars against the Ogoni people will also be punished.” Shell was also found to be providing money and supplies to the Nigerian military. Intel filed its response[1] in September to AMD's lawsuit and refuted AMD's claims, stating that its business practices are fair and lawful.

Shell's involvement in Nigeria came to the fore after the execution of dissident Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight others. The case in Japan led to "dawn raids" by the European Commission on some European Intel offices in July 2005. Shell operates in Nigeria under the name Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC). The Japanese Fair Trade Commission found in favour of AMD; the other case will be heard by a court in Delaware. Mobil) it could be more of a force for good by staying in the country than by leaving. In June 2005, AMD sued Intel in two jurisdictions for anti-competitive practices. Shell always argued that unlike other multinationals who withdrew (e.g. Some smaller competitors such as Transmeta produce low-power processors for portable equipment.

Annual General Meetings of the two Group holding companies were disrupted by protesters and Shell was also accused of sanctions breaking. Currently, the only major competitor to Intel on the x86 processor market is Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), with which Intel has had full cross-licensing agreements since 1976: each partner can use the other's patented technological innovations without charge. In the 1970s and 1980s Shell was heavily criticised by anti Apartheid activists for continuing to carry out business in the Republic of South Africa. Intel's market dominance (at one time it controlled over 85% of the market for 32-bit PC microprocessors), combined with Intel's own hardball legal tactics (such as its infamous 338 patent suit versus PC manufacturers) made it an attractive target for litigation, but few of the lawsuits ever amounted to anything. Over the years Shell has been criticized by environmental and human rights groups for a number of their operations, especially in South Africa and Nigeria. Intel's dominance in the x86 microprocessor market led to numerous charges of antitrust violations over the years, including FTC investigations in both the late 1980s and in 1999, and civil actions such as the 1997 suit by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and a patent suit by Intergraph. Commentators have pointed to the break of tradition in this appointment as Ollila will be the first Shell Chairman to be neither Dutch nor British. The switchover to Intel will begin in mid 2006, reportedly appearing first in Apple's low-end machines and portables.

The appointment will be effective from 1 June 2006. In particular, the large power requirement of the G5 chips was seen as a major stumbling block, preventing the placement of such a chip in one of Apple's laptop computers, the PowerBook and iBook. On 4 August 2005, the board of directors of Royal Dutch Shell plc announced the appointment of Jorma Ollila, currently Chairman and CEO of Nokia, to succeed Aad Jacobs as the company’s Non-Executive Chairman. Also, it was implied that the future PowerPC roadmap was unable to satisfy Apple's needs in terms of computing power. An original investor, the largest single shareholder of Royal Dutch Shell is the holding company owned by the Dutch Royal Family, which was set up by Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands. Reasons stated for the change were vague, but included thermal issues, as recent G5-class PowerPC chips are well-known for running hot. Although, to meet company law in all countries, there were executive and non-executive nominated directors of both Royal Dutch and Shell Transport and Trading , the Group had in fact been run by an executive body called the "Committee of Managing Directors" (CMD), whose members were the (executive) Managing Directors of the two parent companies. On June 6, 2005, Apple Computer CEO Steve Jobs announced in his keynote address at WWDC that Apple would be switching from its long-favored PowerPC Architecture to Intel CPUs.

Even now, likely for tax reasons, the company's shares are divided into two classes, A and B, representing the former Royal Dutch and Shell shares respectively. The competition between Intel and Microsoft was revealed in testimony at the Microsoft anti-trust trial. In many cases, subsidiary companies are held in partnership with other companies or governments. IAL's software efforts met with a more mixed fate; its video and graphics software was important in the development of software digital video, but later its efforts were largely overshadowed by competition from Microsoft. The Shell interest in subsidiaries is always divided 60/40 in favor of Royal Dutch. During the 1990s, Intel's Intel Architecture Labs (IAL) was responsible for many of the hardware innovations of the personal computer, including the PCI Bus, the PCI Express (PCIe) bus, the Universal Serial Bus (USB), and the now-dominant architecture for multi-processor servers. Shell Canada) also have local shareholders and are traded on local stock markets. When the PC industry exploded in the late 1980s and 1990s, Intel was the primary beneficiary.

These two companies jointly owned all the operating companies in the group, although some (e.g. Until then, manufacture of complex integrated circuits was not reliable enough for customers to depend on a single supplier, but Grove began producing processors in three geographically-distinct factories, and ceased licensing the chip designs to competitors such as Zilog and AMD. The two holding companies were the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company of the Netherlands and The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company plc of the United Kingdom. A key element of his plan was the notion, then considered radical, of becoming the single-source for successors to the popular 8086 microprocessor. Prior to unification on 20 July 2005, the group was a dual listed company. Grove described this transition in the book Only the Paranoid Survive. through 2004, and non-exclusively through 2006. In 1983, at the dawn of the personal computer era, Intel's profits came under increased pressure from Japanese memory-chip manufacturers, and then-President Andy Grove drove the company into a focus on microprocessors.

Shell may exclusively use the Texaco brand in the U.S. (Note: Intel is usually given credit with Texas Instruments for the almost-simultaneous invention of the microprocessor). In 2001, Shell purchased about 13,000 Texaco stations and several refineries in the United States to permit Texaco to merge with Chevron Corporation. Originally developed for the Japanese company Busicom to replace a number of ASIC's in a calculator already produced by Busicom, the Intel 4004 was introduced to the mass market on November 15, 1971, though the microprocessor did not become the core of Intel's business until the mid-1980s.
. Concurrently, Intel engineers Marcian Hoff, Federico Faggin, Stanley Mazor and Masatoshi Shima invented the first microprocessor. The Forestry business went the way of Nuclear, Coal,Metals and Electricity generation and was disposed of in 2003. The company's first products were random-access memory integrated circuits, and Intel grew to be a leader in the fiercely competitive DRAM, SRAM, and ROM markets throughout the 1970s.

In recent years Shell has moved tentatively into alternative Energy with investments in Solar Power; Wind Power; Hydrogen and Forestry. Intel by the end of the 1990s was one of the largest and most successful businesses in the world, though fierce competition within the semiconductor industry has since diminished its position somewhat. However none of these ventures were seen as successful and all have now been disposed of. It is Grove who is now remembered as the company's key leader. These diversifications have included Nuclear Power (a short lived and costly Joint Venture with Gulf Oil in the USA); Coal (Shell Coal was for a time a significant player in mining and marketing); Metals (Shell acquired the Dutch metals-mining company Billiton in 1970) and Electricity generation (a joint Venture with Bechtel called Intergen). Intel's employee number four was Andy Grove (a chemical engineer), who ran the company through much of the 1980s and the high-growth 1990s. Over the years Shell has occasionally sought to diversify away from its core oil, gas and chemicals businesses. It is noteworthy that Intel competitor AMD was also founded by Fairchild defectors, in 1969.

Agrichemicals) have now been disposed of following major restructuring to Shell Chemicals over the past ten years, but there is still a large core chemicals business within the company. Moore (a chemist and physicist) and Robert Noyce (a physicist and co-inventor of the integrated circuit) when they left Fairchild Semiconductor. Some of the Chemicals diversifications (e.g. Intel was founded in 1968 by Gordon E. The Chemicals business, involving the production and marketing of a range of hydrocarbon derived chemicals products, was also a logical step downstream from the processing of crude oil in the refinery. . Similar competencies were required for Natural Gas which has become one of the most important businesses in which Shell is involved and which contributes a significant proportion of the companies’ profits. Intel has advanced research projects in all aspects of semiconductor manufacturing, including MEMS.

The development of technical and commercial expertise in all the stages of this vertical integration from the initial search for oil (exploration) through its harvesting (production), transportation, refining and finally trading and marketing established the core competencies on which the Group was founded. Intel also makes networking cards, motherboard chipsets, components, and other devices. Shell’s primary business was, and is, the management of a vertically integrated oil company. Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) (founded 1968) is a U.S.-based multinational corporation that is best known for designing and manufacturing microprocessors and specialized integrated circuits. Shell has five core businesses: Exploration and Production, Oil Products, Downstream Gas and Power, Chemicals and Renewables, and operates in more than 140 countries across the world. GSTI Software Index. One of the original Seven Sisters, Royal Dutch/Shell is the world's third largest oil company by revenue, and a major player in the petrochemical industry and the solar energy business. SOX (PHLX Semiconductor Sector).

Known as the "Pecten" after the sea shell on which its design is based (the giant scallop, Pecten maximus), the latest version of the logo was designed by Raymond Loewy and introduced in 1971. Nasdaq 100. The Shell emblem is one of the most familiar commercial symbols in the world. S&P 500. By 1907 the company had a fleet of oil tankers. Dow Industrials. When collecting seashell specimens in the Caspian Sea area in 1892, the younger Samuel realised there was potential in exporting lamp oil from the region and commissioned the world's first purpose built oil tanker, the Murex, to enter this market. Intel is publicly traded at NASDAQ with the symbol INTC.

In 1833, the founder's father, also Marcus Samuel, had himself founded an import-export business to sell seashells to London collectors. The origin of the brand name Shell is linked to the origins of The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company. .
.

Shell is the world's third largest publicly traded Oil company based on revenues (After BP and ExxonMobil) and the second most profitable (after ExxonMobil) - (Fortune Global 500 2004). Under the old capital structure, Shell's ADRs were traded on the New York Stock Exchange under RD (Royal Dutch) and SC (Shell). The unification was completed on 20 July 2005. In November 2004 it was announced that that the Shell Group would move to a single capital structure, creating a new parent company to be named Royal Dutch Shell plc, incorporated in England and Wales, and with its principal listing on the London Stock Exchange but its headquarters in The Hague in the Netherlands.

In 1931, partly in response to the difficult economic conditions of the times, Shell-Mex merged their marketing operations in the UK (only) with those of British Petroleum to create Shell-Mex and BP Ltd a company that continued to trade until the brands separated again in 1975. In 1919, Shell took control of the Mexican Eagle Petroleum Company and in 1921 formed Shell-Mex Limited which marketed products under the “Shell” and “Eagle” brands in the United Kingdom. The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company (the quotation marks are official) was a British company which dated back to 1897 and which had been founded by Marcus Samuel, and his brother, Samuel Samuel. Royal Dutch Petroleum Company had been founded in 1890 by Jean Kessler, along with Henri Deterding and Hugo Loudon, when a Royal charter was granted by Queen Wilhelmina to a small oil exploration company known as "Royal Dutch.".

Prior to unification, the group operated under a number of operating and shareholder agreements. Koninklijke Nederlandsche Petroleum Maatschappij) and The "Shell" Transport and Trading Company plc merged their operations to compete against the then-giant American oil company, Standard Oil. The Royal Dutch/Shell Group was created in 1907 when Royal Dutch Petroleum Company (legal name in Dutch, N.V. Shell has operations in 140 countries in the world, the biggest of which is in the United States where its operating company is Shell Oil Company, which has its head office in Houston, Texas.

Shell's revenues of $268 billion (2004) made it the fourth largest corporation in the world in 2004 and its profits of $18.18 billion made it the world's second most profitable business in terms of gross profits (calculations based on those numbers demonstrate a gross profit margin of 6.8%). Its corporate headquarters are in The Hague, Netherlands, with legal headquarters in London, United Kingdom. Shell also has a significant petrochemicals business (Shell Chemicals) and an embryonic renewable energy sector developing wind and solar opportunities. Royal Dutch Shell plc is a major energy company, one of the top four vertically integrated private sector oil/gas companies in the world (along with BP, ExxonMobil, and Total).

CFO: Peter Voser. CEO: Jeroen van der Veer.