This page will contain videos about sports illustrated, as they become available.Sports IllustratedJuly 1999 cover showing soccer star Brandi ChastainSports Illustrated is a popular weekly American sports magazine owned by media giant Time Warner. It has over 3 million subscribers and is read by 23 million adults each week, including over 18 million men, 19% of the adult males in the country. It was the first magazine with circulation over one million to win the National Magazine Award for General Excellence twice. Its "swimsuit issue," which has been published since 1964, is now an annual publishing event that generates its own television shows, videos and calendars. HistoryTwo other magazines named Sports Illustrated were actually started in the 1930s and 1940s, but they both quickly failed. In fact, there was no large-base, general sports magazine with a national following when TIME patriarch Henry Luce began considering whether his company should attempt to fill the gap. At the time, many believed sports was beneath the attention of serious journalism and didn't think sports news could fill a weekly magazine, especially during the winter. A number of advisers to Luce, including Life Magazine's Ernest Havemann, tried to kill the idea, but Luce, who was not a sports fan, decided the time was right. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. 17-25). After unsuccessfully offering $200,000 to buy the name Sport for the new magazine, they acquired the rights to the name Sports Illustrated instead for just $10,000. The goal of the new magazine was to be "not A sports magazine, but THE sports magazine." Launched on August 16, 1954, it was not profitable and not particularly well run at first, but Luce's timing could not have been better. The popularity of spectator sports in the United States was about to explode, and that popularity came to be driven largely by three things:
The early issues of the magazine seemed caught between two opposing views of its audience. Much of the subject matter was directed at upper class activities (yachting, polo, and even safaris), but upscale would-be advertisers were unconvinced that sports fans were a significant part of their market. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. 6, 27, 42). InnovationsFrom the start, however, SI did introduce a number of innovations that are generally taken for granted today:
In 1956, Luce asked Time, Inc. senior European Correspondent André Laguerre to come to New York and help define the magazine's character. Many of the staff had serious doubts that the English-born Frenchman could possibly know anything about American sports, but Laguerre won them over, and during his term as Managing Editor (1960 - 1974), SI became a model for other middle-class American magazines. Its writers developed their own characteristic style by daring to tell people what was important. Many would say that the magazine legitimized sports -- and being a sports fan -- for a huge segment of the American population. The steady creation of landmark stories (e.g., "The Black Athlete - A Shameful Story" by Jack Olsen and "Paper Lion" by George Plimpton) showed that sports fans could be readers, and a generation of sportswriters patterned their own writing after what they read in SI. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. 5-8, 160). Color PrintingThe magazine's photographers also made their mark with innovations like putting cameras in the goal at a hockey game and behind a glass backboard at a basketball game. In 1965, offset printing began to allow the color pages of the magazine to be printed overnight, not only producing crisper and brighter images, but also finally enabling the editors to merge the best color with the latest news. By 1967, the magazine was printing 200 pages of "fast color" a year; in 1983, SI became the first American full-color newsweekly. An intense rivalry developed between photographers, particularly Walter Iooss and Neil Leifer, to get a decisive cover shot that would be on newsstands and in mailboxes only a few days later. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. 108-111, 139-141, 149-151, 236). In the late 1970s and early 1980s, during Gil Rogin's term as Managing Editor, the feature stories of Frank Deford became the magazine's anchor. "Bonus pieces" on Pete Rozelle, Bear Bryant, Howard Cosell and others became some of the most quoted sources about these figures, and Deford established a reputation as one of the best writers of the time. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. 236-238). Creative DeclineAfter the death of Henry Luce in 1967, the creative freedom that the staff had enjoyed seemed to diminish. By the 1980s and 1990s, the magazine had become more profitable than ever, but many also believed it had become more predictable. Mark Mulvoy was the first top editor whose background contained nothing but sports; he had grown up as one of the magazine's readers, but he had no interest in fiction, movies, hobbies or history. Mulvoy's top writer Rick Reilly had also been raised on SI and followed in the footsteps of many of the great writers that he grew up admiring, but many felt that the magazine as a whole came to reflect Mulvoy's complete lack of sophistication. Critics said that it rarely broke (or even featured) stories on the major controversies in sports (drugs, violence, commercialism) any more, and that it focused on major sports and celebrities to the exclusion of other topics. The proliferation of "commemorative issues" and crass subscription incentives seemed to some like an exchange of journalistic integrity for commercial opportunism. More importantly, perhaps, many feel that 24-hour-a-day cable sports television networks and sports news web sites have forever diminished the role a weekly publication can play in today's world, and that it is unlikely any magazine will ever again achieve the level of prominence that SI once had. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. 8-9, 268-273, 354-358, 394-398, 402-405). Sportsman of the YearSince its inception, Sports Illustrated has annually presented the "Sportsman of the Year" award. The Cover JinxDecember, 1970 Sports Illustrated cover showing Texas Longhorn fullback Steve "Woo-Woo" WorsterWhen Major League Baseball player Eddie Mathews, pictured on the cover of Volume 1, Issue 1, suffered a hand injury a week later that forced him to miss seven games, the "Sports Illustrated Cover Jinx" -- a.k.a. "The Dreaded SI Cover Jinx" -- was born, as some noted that bad things seemed to happen to people soon after they appeared on the magazine's cover. Other notable cover coincidences include:
While the list of "examples" of the jinx is extensive, an individual record 49 cover appearances by Michael Jordan and team record 61 covers by the New York Yankees have not hindered their success. Writers
SpinoffsSports Illustrated has helped launched a number of related publishing ventures, including:
References
This page about sports illustrated includes information from a Wikipedia article. Additional articles about sports illustrated News stories about sports illustrated External links for sports illustrated Videos for sports illustrated Wikis about sports illustrated Discussion Groups about sports illustrated Blogs about sports illustrated Images of sports illustrated |
|
Sports Illustrated has helped launched a number of related publishing ventures, including:. It is sometimes said that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", but many pro-research groups only claim that the topic deserves further investigation, not that UFOs ar. While the list of "examples" of the jinx is extensive, an individual record 49 cover appearances by Michael Jordan and team record 61 covers by the New York Yankees have not hindered their success. On the other hand, many still inexplicable cases are either ignored by the media or, if a purported skeptic offers an explanation that fails to fit the facts (e.g., Zig-zagging formation of lights and confirmed by radar are blamed on misinterpreting 'Jupiter'), it is often taken up by the press and the case is closed, as far as the media is concerned. Other notable cover coincidences include:. Sightings like this are harder to dismiss."[34]. "The Dreaded SI Cover Jinx" -- was born, as some noted that bad things seemed to happen to people soon after they appeared on the magazine's cover. Some of the most intriguing sightings have been made by seasoned pilots and passengers aboard air line flights which have also been tracked by radar and have been videotaped. When Major League Baseball player Eddie Mathews, pictured on the cover of Volume 1, Issue 1, suffered a hand injury a week later that forced him to miss seven games, the "Sports Illustrated Cover Jinx" -- a.k.a. Similarly, Physicist Michio Kaku states that although "perhaps 99% of all sightings of UFOs can be dismissed as being caused by familiar phenomena" that "What is disturbing, to a physicist however, is the remaining 1% of these sightings, which are multiple sightings made by multiple methods of observations. Since its inception, Sports Illustrated has annually presented the "Sportsman of the Year" award. However, even if the overwhelming majority of all UFOs become IFOs, one well documented case such as the Chile 1997 radar/visual case confirmed by the government in Santiago [33] is sufficient to negate the 'null hypothesis'. 8-9, 268-273, 354-358, 394-398, 402-405). Their percentage of unexplained cases out of 3200 studied was 22%, which went up to 35% for the best cases. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. The 1950s Battelle Memorial Institute statistical study, commissioned by Project Blue Book, found that it was actually the better cases with the better witnesses and evidence that tended to defy explanation. More importantly, perhaps, many feel that 24-hour-a-day cable sports television networks and sports news web sites have forever diminished the role a weekly publication can play in today's world, and that it is unlikely any magazine will ever again achieve the level of prominence that SI once had. However, a small residual, from 3% to 30% depending on who is doing the counting, remain unexplained. The proliferation of "commemorative issues" and crass subscription incentives seemed to some like an exchange of journalistic integrity for commercial opportunism. After investigation, most UFOs actually become IFOs — Identified Flying Objects. Critics said that it rarely broke (or even featured) stories on the major controversies in sports (drugs, violence, commercialism) any more, and that it focused on major sports and celebrities to the exclusion of other topics. Only a few percent of sightings have been actual hoaxes. Mulvoy's top writer Rick Reilly had also been raised on SI and followed in the footsteps of many of the great writers that he grew up admiring, but many felt that the magazine as a whole came to reflect Mulvoy's complete lack of sophistication. These turn out to be honest mistakes. Mark Mulvoy was the first top editor whose background contained nothing but sports; he had grown up as one of the magazine's readers, but he had no interest in fiction, movies, hobbies or history. Skeptics and ufologists both agree that the vast majority of cases can be explained as natural phenomena, usually misidentification of objects that viewers are either unfamiliar with or see in unusual conditions. By the 1980s and 1990s, the magazine had become more profitable than ever, but many also believed it had become more predictable. There is sometimes corroborating evidence such as simultaneous radar contact, photographs/movies/video, or physical interactions with the environment, e.g., electromagnetic interference, physiological effects, or "landing traces." (see Science and UFOs section). After the death of Henry Luce in 1967, the creative freedom that the staff had enjoyed seemed to diminish. It is also noted that UFO evidence goes beyond just eyewitness accounts. 236-238). Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell are two NASA astronauts who have expressed an interest in UFOs, and both have decried what they consider the biased attitudes of some professionals; Cooper claims to have seen UFOs in the early 1950s. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. Some Ufologists argue such cases are more difficult to dismiss as misidentification of mundane objects. "Bonus pieces" on Pete Rozelle, Bear Bryant, Howard Cosell and others became some of the most quoted sources about these figures, and Deford established a reputation as one of the best writers of the time. Some feel that UFO study is still a worthwhile topic because of open questions, especially due to occasional reports of UFOs from professional or military astronomers or pilots — individuals whose careers, and often their very lives, rely on their ability to recognize and assess aircraft, weather conditions, distances, and other factors vital to flight. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, during Gil Rogin's term as Managing Editor, the feature stories of Frank Deford became the magazine's anchor. Some of the more popular hypotheses for explaining UFOs are:. 108-111, 139-141, 149-151, 236). The remaining residue of unexplained UFO sightings constitute a debate on their ultimate origin. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. Depending on who is doing the evaluation, between about 3% and 30% of all cases remain unexplained. An intense rivalry developed between photographers, particularly Walter Iooss and Neil Leifer, to get a decisive cover shot that would be on newsstands and in mailboxes only a few days later. Common misidentifications of natural objects include:. By 1967, the magazine was printing 200 pages of "fast color" a year; in 1983, SI became the first American full-color newsweekly. Common misidentifications of human phenomena include:. In 1965, offset printing began to allow the color pages of the magazine to be printed overnight, not only producing crisper and brighter images, but also finally enabling the editors to merge the best color with the latest news. Hendry’s conclusions were:. The magazine's photographers also made their mark with innovations like putting cameras in the goal at a hockey game and behind a glass backboard at a basketball game. Hendry admitted that he would like to find evidence for extraterrestrials but noted that the vast majority of cases had prosaic explanations. 5-8, 160). In 1979, Hendry published his conclusions in The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and Reporting UFO Sightings. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. Hendry spent 15 months personally investigating 1,307 UFO reports. The steady creation of landmark stories (e.g., "The Black Athlete - A Shameful Story" by Jack Olsen and "Paper Lion" by George Plimpton) showed that sports fans could be readers, and a generation of sportswriters patterned their own writing after what they read in SI. Allen Hynek (who had been a consultant for the Air Force’s Project Blue Book) to provide a serious scientific investigation into UFOs. Many would say that the magazine legitimized sports -- and being a sports fan -- for a huge segment of the American population. CUFOS was founded by Dr. Its writers developed their own characteristic style by daring to tell people what was important. In contrast, much more conservative numbers for the percentage of UFOs were arrived at individually by Allen Hendry, who was the chief investigator for the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). Many of the staff had serious doubts that the English-born Frenchman could possibly know anything about American sports, but Laguerre won them over, and during his term as Managing Editor (1960 - 1974), SI became a model for other middle-class American magazines. For example, scientists for the Battelle Memorial Institute, who did a study for the USAF of 3201 UFO cases in the 1950s, ended up with 22% being unidentified, using the stringent criteria that all four analysts had to agree that the case had no prosaic explanation, whereas agreement of only two analysts was needed to list the case as explained. senior European Correspondent André Laguerre to come to New York and help define the magazine's character. UFOs depends on who is doing the study and can vary widely depending on criteria. In 1956, Luce asked Time, Inc. However, the actual percentages of IFOs vs. From the start, however, SI did introduce a number of innovations that are generally taken for granted today:. While a small percentage of UFO reports are deliberate hoaxes, most are misidentifications of natural and man-made phenomena. 6, 27, 42). It has been estimated that up to 90% of all reported UFO sightings are eventually identified. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. [32] (See also wonder weapons). Much of the subject matter was directed at upper class activities (yachting, polo, and even safaris), but upscale would-be advertisers were unconvinced that sports fans were a significant part of their market. [31] Other microwave weapons have been proposed that would cause loss of bodily functions. The early issues of the magazine seemed caught between two opposing views of its audience. [30] A microwave crowd control nonlethal weapon causing heating and intense pain was announced in 2001. The popularity of spectator sports in the United States was about to explode, and that popularity came to be driven largely by three things:. The same weapon is also reported capable of disrupting aircraft navigation and communication systems, as well as ground electronics and power grids. The goal of the new magazine was to be "not A sports magazine, but THE sports magazine." Launched on August 16, 1954, it was not profitable and not particularly well run at first, but Luce's timing could not have been better. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board issued a report on 21st century air force weaponry, in which they described microwave directed energy weapons that could be used to stall vehicles, making them easy targets for bombing. After unsuccessfully offering $200,000 to buy the name Sport for the new magazine, they acquired the rights to the name Sports Illustrated instead for just $10,000. In late 1998, the U.S. 17-25). Some recently reported developments in electronic warfare mimic electromagnetic interference and physiologic effects described in UFO cases dating back to the 1940s and 1950s, and may conceivably be examples of military reverse engineering efforts. (MacCambridge, 1997, pp. Leik Myrabo, Professor of Engineering Physics at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute as a possible advance in hypersonic flight.[29]1995 Aviation Week article. A number of advisers to Luce, including Life Magazine's Ernest Havemann, tried to kill the idea, but Luce, who was not a sports fan, decided the time was right. McCampbell's solution of a microwave plasma parting the air in front of the craft is currently being researched by Dr. At the time, many believed sports was beneath the attention of serious journalism and didn't think sports news could fill a weekly magazine, especially during the winter. Among subjects tackled by both McCampbell and Hill was the question of how UFOs can fly at supersonic speeds without creating a sonic boom. In fact, there was no large-base, general sports magazine with a national following when TIME patriarch Henry Luce began considering whether his company should attempt to fill the gap. Examples are former NASA engineer James McCampbell in his book Ufology online and NACA/NASA engineer Paul Hill in his book Unconventional Flying Objects. Two other magazines named Sports Illustrated were actually started in the 1930s and 1940s, but they both quickly failed. Some scientists and engineers have attempted to reverse engineer the possible physics behind UFOs through analysis of both eyewitness reports and the physical evidence. . A comprehensive scientific review of physical evidence cases was carried out by the 1997 Sturrock UFO panel.[28]. Its "swimsuit issue," which has been published since 1964, is now an annual publishing event that generates its own television shows, videos and calendars. Despite the low opinion of the subject matter possibly held by many scientists, many reported physical effects would seem to be ripe for scientific analysis. It was the first magazine with circulation over one million to win the National Magazine Award for General Excellence twice. A list of various physical evidence cases includes:. It has over 3 million subscribers and is read by 23 million adults each week, including over 18 million men, 19% of the adult males in the country. However, even the ambiguous physical cases should be amenable to statistical analysis to reveal possible underlying trends across cases. Sports Illustrated is a popular weekly American sports magazine owned by media giant Time Warner. Analyses of most cases have results that are ambiguous or inconclusive. Michael MacCambridge, 1997, The Franchise: A History of Sports Illustrated Magazine, Hyperion Press ISBN 0786862165. A larger fraction, including those researched by governmental and military authorities, have been labeled unidentified or unexplainable. Ceased publication in December 2005 because of a weak advertising climate. A small fraction of these cases have been shown to be deliberate hoaxes. Circulation of one million readers between the ages of 18 and 24. More direct physical evidence comes from "close encounters of the second kind," interactions occurring at close range, which include so-called "landing traces," and physiological effects. Distributed free on 72 college campuses through a network of college newspapers. data obtained from afar, such as radar contacts or photographs. Dedicated to college athletics and the sports interests of college students. Hynek's close encounter scale would define indirect physical evidence as data obtained from "close encounters of the first kind," i.e. Launched on September 4, 2003. There have, in fact been many UFO reports accompanied by physical evidence of various kinds, both direct and indirect. Sports Illustrated on Campus magazine
Launched in March 2000. Michio Kaku, that the demand for hard physical evidence (the fabled "alien hubcap") is an unreasonably restrictive one. Sports Illustrated Women magazine (highest circulation 400,000)
SI.com sports news web site
Won the "Parents' Choice Magazine Award" 7 times. A massive statistical analysis of UFO cases, called Project Blue Book Special Report No. Won the "Distinguished Achievement for Excellence in Educational Publishing" award 11 times. Hundreds of witnesses were interviewed to determine object characteristics and also to try to recover fragments through determination of trajectories. Launched in January 1989. One example of applying such techniques in researching UFO reports occurred during investigations of the mysterious Green Fireballs that suddenly appeared over sensitive military and research installations in New Mexico in the late 1940s. Sports Illustrated for Kids magazine (circulation 950,000)
Steve Rushin. Witnesses to meteor fireballs, for example, can be interviewed to reconstruct trajectories, and this often leads to recovery of meteorite fragments. Ed Hinton (1995-2000). One objection to this argument is that even eyewitness accounts can be treated with scientific methods to obtain important information. Paul Zimmerman. If there is no physical evidence, then it is contended there is no way that physical scientists can contribute to the resolution of this problem. Tom Verducci. Others feel that physical scientists cannot get involved in the UFO problem unless there is associated physical evidence. Gary Van Sickle. Sightings may also be accompanied by corroborating information such as radar tracking, movies, or physical effects on individuals or the environment. Phil Taylor. There have also been mass sightings, sometimes involving hundreds or even thousands of witnesses. Rick Reilly. A large fraction of reports involve more than one witness, and sometimes an event is witnessed from two or more different locations. Arash Markazi. However, it is also pointed out that trying to reduce UFO sightings to mere psychological misperceptions of individuals is often inadequate. Peter King. Indeed, most reports simply comprise narrative accounts of what someone saw or thought he saw in the sky. Gary Smith. Still, some claim the general perception in the scientific community remains that, if UFO reports pose a scientific problem at all, it has more to do with psychology and the science of perception than with physical science. Frank Deford. [16]. Marty Burns. 57% for high school graduates and 36% for those with only grade school education. March 6, 2005 - The University of Illinois men's basketball team was 29-0 the day of their appearance, losing their final regular season game to Ohio State University. For example, a 1978 Gallup poll found 66% of college graduates thought UFOs real vs. June 5, 1995 - Three days after his appearance, San Francisco Giants third baseman Matt Williams, the National League leader in home runs, batting average and RBIs, fouled a pitch off his right foot, breaking it, and forcing him to miss 2 1/2 months. Opinion polls of the general public have also consistently shown that the higher the education the more likely people are to believe UFOs are real. September 4, 1989 - Not his picture, but Major League Baseball Commissioner Bart Giamatti's words about Pete Rose appeared on the cover the week Giamatti died of a heart attack. Two 1970s surveys of MENSA members revealed over 50% thought they were from space. December 14, 1970 - The University of Texas, 10-0 and enjoying a 30-game winning streak, fumbled nine times in its next game, a 24-11 loss to Notre Dame in the Cotton Bowl. A 1978 survey of Optical Spectra readers found 42% felt it "quite conceivable" that UFOs were space ships from other civilizations. February 13, 1961 - Laurence Owen was billed as "America's Most Exciting Girl Skater." Two days after the cover date, Owen and the rest of the United States figure skating team perished in a plane crash. 54% thought UFOs definitely or probably existed and 32% thought they came from outer space. May 26, 1958 - SI's 1958 Indianapolis 500 preview issue featured Pat O'Connor, who was killed in a 15-car pileup during the first lap of the race. A 1971 survey of Industrial Research/Development magazine, based on 90,000 readers, found that 76% felt the government wasn't revealing all it knew about UFOs. Notre Dame had also been the last team to defeat Oklahoma before the streak began, in 1953. Other surveys of scientific/technical and well-educated groups also show clear interest in UFOs or belief that they are real or extraterrestrial. The cover carried the headline "Why Oklahoma is unbeatable." In their very next game, Oklahoma lost to the University of Notre Dame, which was in the middle of a down period. Jacques Vallee claims many scientists are interested in investigating UFOs but prefer to work quietly in the background because of the attached "ridicule factor." Vallee refers to these scientists as the "invisible college.". November 18, 1957 -- The University of Oklahoma had won 47 consecutive games, which remains the longest winning streak in the history of college football. Dr. January 31, 1955 - The week that an issue featuring her was on the stands, skier Jill Kinmont struck a tree during a practice run and was paralyzed from the neck down. Possibly fear of ridicule by colleagues or fear of professional repercussions may figure in suppressing open expression of interest in the subject within the scientific community. In-depth sports reporting from writers like Robert Creamer, Tex Maule and Dan Jenkins. Sturrock noted in summarizing his surveys that guaranteed anonymity was important in getting high rates of response. Scouting reports - including a World Series Preview and New Year's Day bowl game roundup that enhanced the viewing of games on television. [14][15]. Liberal use of color photos - though the six-week lead time initially meant they were unable to depict timely subject matter. 10% thought UFOs were from space. Sports Illustrated. 5% said they had had UFO sightings. television, and. About two-thirds thought UFOs were possibly, probably, or certainly a scientifically significant problem. economic prosperity. Sturrock did another survey of over 400 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics members in 1973. His results were: [13]. Following a formal 1977 survey of the American Astronomical Society, Sturrock learned that a majority of those who responded to the survey (1356 responded; over half of the AAS membership) thought that UFOs deserved scientific study, and were willing to contribute their time and expertise to such studies. This alleged widespread negative feeling among the scientific community regarding UFOs as outlined above has been challenged as inaccurate. A good introduction to this aspect of the subject is given by one of the authors, astronomer Bernard Haisch, in his website [12], an introduction to the area for scientists, which has a link to the JBIS article. Recently, hopes that this theme might be about to become respectable again were raised when a peer reviewed article on UFOs and SETI appeared in JBIS, the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. [11] Nonetheless, the positive evidence presented by Sturrock and others in support of UFO reality has seen little attention or support from other scientists. McDonald wrote a paper called "Science in Default," criticizing the Condon Report for bad science, and furthermore criticising mainstream science for its failure to deal with the subject. James E. When the report came out in late 1969, atmospheric physicist Dr. Sturrock [10], have shown that the conclusions section was badly at variance with the report's actual contents, where about 30% of the cases examined could not be explained. Peter A. Subsequent reviews by the AIAA, and more recently by a scientific panel organized by Dr. However, the conclusions section of the report was written by Condon, who expressed public disdain for the subject long before the investigation was concluded. In the past, the Condon Report's negative conclusions seem to have been particularly damaging to the likelihood of large numbers of scientists involving themselves seriously in the investigation of UFOs. Some of these are:. Proponents, however, note that there are counterarguments to all of these objections. Why, for example, would sightings occur with great frequency for decades without any attempt by the alien intelligence to communicate its presence unambiguously? Or if an extraterrestrial civilization was engaged in mapping or otherwise investigating the earth, as some have hypothesized, why would it take so long, when present-day terrestrial technology, such as satellites, can do the job so quickly?. While many scientists would agree that the sighting of a genuine extraterrestrial craft is not an impossibility, some also argue that that the patterns of reported UFO behavior do not personally strike them as rational. Other reasons often cited for the disdain shown by many scientists for the subject are:. (See Physical Evidence section below). These include simultaneous radar contact, photographs/movies/videos, radiation increases, electromagnetic interference, and physiological/biological effects. Others point out that it is erroneous to claim the evidence is only observational and that a number of recorded physical effects also exist that are amenable to research by the physical sciences. In such examples, the eyewitness accounts of such phenomena eventually proved correct despite initial skepticism, denial, and sometimes hostility from many scientists. Some in the scientific community feel there is enough evidence to warrant further investigation efforts, comparing it to the period in the history of meteorite research or atmospheric electrical phenomena such as sprites or ball lightning when there was only witness testimony available. Some academics have argued that this constitutes unacceptable bias, and that while current evidence may be lacking, new evidence should be evaluated objectively as it arises. As the Sturrock poll results below suggest, absence of study of the subject increases skepticism and strongly affects willingness to investigate. It has been suggested, however, that rather few academics have actually researched the topic themselves or become personally familiar with the literature. Unreliability of witness testimony is often cited. Still many academics feel that the subject is a waste of time, due to a number of factors. Air Force studies found that the strong preponderance of identified sightings were due to misidentifications, with hoaxes and psychological aberrations accounting for only a few percent of all cases. Statistics compiled by U.S. Despite unexplained cases, the general official opinion of the mainstream scientific community is probably that all UFO sightings ultimately result from ordinary misidentification of natural and man-made phenomena, deliberate hoaxes, or psychological phenomena such as optical illusions or dreaming/sleep paralysis (often given as an explanation for purported alien abductions). Perhaps the best known study was Project Blue Book, conducted by the United States Air Force from 1952. Despite a strong residue of extremely puzzling cases, no national government has ever publicly suggested that UFOs represent any form of alien intelligence. Governments or military agencies of the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and the Soviet Union, are known to have carried out the investigation of UFO reports at various times. UFOs have been subject to various investigations over the years, varying widely in scope and scientific rigor. Each of these may have had some impact in dampening the interest of the scientific community in regard to UFO research. It has also been contended that the CIA's 1953 Robertson Panel recommendations of official public ridicule through the mass media has made the subject scientifically and politically taboo. Many scientists also assume that the 1969 Condon Report settled the issue, hence UFO data is no longer worth examining. This may be due in part to the fact that there are no public or government funds to support UFO research. Despite the large number of reports and great public interest, the scientific community has shown little interest in UFOs. These reports have been attributed to a wide range of causes including planets, stars, meteors, cloud formations, ball lightning, deliberate hoaxes, experimental military aircraft, hallucinations, and extraterrestrial spacecraft. Since the late 1940s, people throughout the world have become familiar with UFO reports. Putting aside the question of physical reality of UFOs, there have been studies of UFOs and UFO enthusiast subcultures from a folklore or anthropological perspective, and some feel the subject, at the very least, may provide new insights in the fields of psychology (both individual and social), sociology, and communications. It is a common error to assume that the only question of interest provided by the subject is whether UFOs represent alien intelligence (Peter Sturrock has argued that this emphasis on the extraterrestrial hypothesis has narrowed the field and restricted debate). Probably the most favored theory among advocates is the more conventional extraterrestrial hypothesis, though the Interdimensional hypothesis and the Paranormal/Occult Hypothesis for UFOs are sometimes given as possibilities by some (see also below). Unfortunately, the quality of investigations by amateur researchers can vary enormously. While most academics prefer to ignore the subject, others, including mostly amateur and some professional scientific researchers, continue to investigate. Ufology is the study of UFO reports and associated evidence. Two notable organizations, UFO Casebook[8] and Malevolent Alien Abduction Research[9] also study UFOs, alien contact. The groups listed below have embraced a broad variety of approaches, and have seen a correspondingly wide variety of responses from mainstream critics or supporters. Some have achieved fair degrees of mainstream visibility while others remain obscure. There have been a number of civilian groups formed to study UFO’s and/or to promulgate their opinions on the subject. Sometimes lawsuits have had to be filed to get even the censored documents released to the public. In addition, many documents still remain classified or are heavily censored even when released, such as those of the CIA. Furthermore, the official Air Force position was frequently at odds with internal, classified documents, many later released under the Freedom of Information Act, which proved that the subject was treated far more seriously by the Air Force and other government agencies, like the CIA and FBI, than the public had been led to believe. Both contemporary and modern critics, however, argue that some of the listed studies harbored an unacceptable degree of bias, were involved in sloppy science of dubious validity, or even perpetrating a cover up. Air Force public position was that UFO reports were due almost entirely to misidentification of ordinary aerial phenomena, delusion, or hoaxes. Ultimately, the official U.S. government began a number of formal studies of UFOs:. In response to the June-July 1947 wave of UFO sightings and resulting publicity, the U.S. The equipment was designed to detect gamma rays, magnetic fluctuations, radio noises and gravity or mass changes in the atmosphere. In the early 1950s, Project Magnet was created to investigate the possibility of discs powered by magnetic propulsion. See Australian Ufology. Harley Rutledge established Project Identification in 1973 to gather scientific data. Challenged to explain sightings of unidentified lights and luminous phenomena in the hills around Piedmont, Missouri, Dr. One established non-military station, which has seriously monitored UFOs, including anomalous lights, is project Hessdalen AMS in Norway. Jung, however, also felt that at least some UFOs were "nuts and bolts" craft, based on physical evidence such as simultaneous radar contact. A notable attempt on the basis of his theory of archetypes was made by the Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung in his book Flying Saucers (1959). No single and comprehensive "psychological" theory to explain UFO reports has yet been proposed. Other researchers, such as Jacques Vallee, argue that if UFO sightings are motivated by some mechanism through which the public can release hidden fears and satisfy a psychological need for fantasies, why did "UFO waves" not coincide with such science-fiction feats such as Orson Welles' radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds in 1938, or the motion-picture versions of Flash Gordon (1936-37)? Vallee points out that the theory regarding how the general public generates and propagates UFO reports as a way of releasing psychological tensions, is denied by the absence of correlation between notable periods of interest in science fiction and major peaks of UFO activity. surrounded by a great deal more misidentification, wishful thinking and general flakiness." [6]. One writer contends that UFO mass sightings — sometimes called "flaps" — are "a hard core of genuinely unusual sightings .. Other advocates, arguing for the non-conventional interpretation, reply that the volume of impressive sightings reported by witnesses, from commercial airline pilots to United States presidents, and occasionally captured on film and radar, possesses strong consistency and cannot be explained away simply as mundane phenomena (weather balloons, aircraft, Venus, etc.). However, some feel that such speculation is overly premature because the very actuality of UFOs as alien craft is itself problematic. Another view is that the shape may be concealed or distorted by space-time distortions arising from an anti-gravity propulsion system. Air ionization could also partly explain the diversity of colors reported, as different air molecules are excited at different energy levels, as well as the electric, neon-like glow around the objects often reported, similar to what happens with polar auroras. Another argument is that the true underlying shape may, in some cases, be concealed or distorted by the ionization of air around the objects, believed by some researchers, such as NASA engineers Paul Hill and James McCampbell or rocketry pioneer Hermann Oberth, to be a characteristic of the propulsion system. Still others argue that there is a large diversity in the shapes and sizes of human flying craft, reflecting different origins, propulsion systems, and purposes, so such diversity in UFOs is not necessarily unexpected or inexplicable. Other researchers argue that the large diversity of UFO shapes points to a possible paraphysical origin. Skeptics argue this diversity of shapes, size and configurations points to a socio-psychological explanation. The number of different shapes, sizes, and configurations of claimed UFOs has been large, with descriptions of chevrons, equilateral triangles, spheres, domes, diamonds, shapeless black masses, eggs, and cylinders. Comprehensive review of opinion polls on UFOs since 1947. [5]. The younger the person was, the more likely the person were to hold such beliefs. But 56% thought UFOs were real craft and 48% that UFOs had visited the Earth. Again about 70% felt the government was not sharing everything it knew about UFOs or extraterrestrial life. A 2002 Roper poll for the Sci Fi channel found similar results, but with more people believing UFOs were extraterrestrial craft. government has been less than forthright in regard to UFOs than accept the ETH. The poll results may also simply suggest that a greater percentage of those polled believe that the U.S. Another Gallup poll in 2001 found that 33% of respondents "believe that extraterrestrials have visited the Earth sometime in the past." [4] These two poll results may seem confusing or contradictory if one considers only the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) as an explanation for UFOs. A 1996 Gallup poll reported that 71% of the United States' population believed that the government was covering up information regarding UFOs. UFOs have played a role in tourism, such as in Roswell, New Mexico, site of a supposed UFO crash in 1947 (see Roswell UFO incident). There have also been notable hoaxes involving UFO reports, some of which have received substantial press attention (see the list below). UFO topics were amongst the most popular on early computer Bulletin board systems (Bullard writes that "Only sex Web sites outscore UFOs for popularity on the internet." (Bullard, 141), and millions of people have some degree of interest in the subject. Bullard writes, "UFOs have invaded modern consciousness in overwhelming force, and endless streams books, magazine articles, tabloid covers, movies, TV shows, cartoons, advertisements, greeting cards, toys, T-shirts, even alien-head salt and pepper shakers, attest to the popularity of this phenomenon, its ability to hold public attention, and, yes, to sell! Gallup polls rank UFOs near the top of lists for subjects of widespread recognition--in fact, a 1973 survey found that 95 percent of the public had heard of UFOs, whereas in 1977 only 92 percent had heard of Gerald Ford in a poll taken just nine months after he left the White House." (Bullard, 141). Thomas E. Folklorist Dr. Regardless of any ultimate explanation, UFOs constitute a widespread international cultural phenomenon of the last half-century. Physicist Edward Condon suggested the word should be pronounced "ooh-foe", but this seems to have largely been ignored. However it is generally pronounced by forming each letter: "U.F.O.". Ruppelt suggested that "UFO" should be pronounced as a word — "you-foe". In Italian, German and Japanese, UFO is an acronym instead of an initialism. In Finnish the acronym for UFO is TLK ("Tunnistamaton Lentävä Kohde"). In Russian, the term is NLO or "Neopoznannyi Letaushschii Ob'ekt" (Неопознанный Летающий Объект). In Spanish, Portuguese, and French, the acronym for UFO is OVNI (in Spanish, Objeto Volador No Identificado, in Portuguese, Objeto Voador Não Identificado, in French, Objet Volant Non Identifié). Along these lines, Paul Hill, an early NACA/NASA aerospace engineer, titled his 1970s book on the subject, Unconventional Flying Objects. Thus the "U" in "UFO", instead of standing for "Unidentified", would more aptly stand for "Unexplained" or "Unconventional". For example, Air Force Regulation 200-2, issued in 1954, defined an Unidentified Flying Object (UFOB) as "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." Furthermore, investigation of UFOBs was stated to be for the purposes of national security and to ascertain "technical aspects." Obviously these concerns would not apply to the usual explanations for most UFO sightings, such as natural phenomena or man-made conventional objects, except, perhaps, previously unknown foreign aircraft. In contrast, researchers like Hynek have argued that the term should be strictly limited to those sightings that have been intensively investigated and still defy conventional explanation, which was the actual definition adopted by the Air Force in official directives in the 1950s. Skeptics often argue that UFO simply means that the object was "unidentified" by those making the sighting and doesn't mean the object is unexplainable, much less extraterrestrial. An unforeseen difficulty with the term "UFO" is that it often leads to semantic debates between skeptics and advocates. Ruppelt recounted his experiences with Project Blue Book in his memoir, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (1956) online. His suggestion was quickly adopted by the Air Force, who also briefly used "UFOB" circa 1954. Air Force's Project Blue Book, who felt that "flying saucer" did not reflect the diversity of the sightings. S. Ruppelt, the first director of the U. Edward J. Use of "UFO" instead of "flying saucer" was first suggested in 1952 by Capt. The term "UFO" was more commonly used by the late 1960s. "Flying Saucer" was the preferred term for most unidentified aerial sightings from the late 1940s to the 1960s, even for those that were not actually saucer-shaped. So did popular books on the subject such as Frank Scully's Behind the Flying Saucers (1950), Donald Keyhoe's The Flying Saucers Are Real (1950) and Flying Saucers From Outer Space (1953), and "contactee"-oriented books, such as George Adamski's Flying Saucers Have Landed (1953). the Flying Saucers (1956), depicting flying saucer-like craft, further entrenched the term as a cultural icon. Hollywood science fiction movies in the 1950s, such as The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951), Forbidden Planet (1956), and Earth vs. By mid-1950, a Gallup poll revealed that the term "flying saucer" had become so deeply ingrained in the American vernacular that 94% of those polled were familiar with it, making it the best-known term appearing in the news, easily beating out others like "universal military training" (75%), "bookie" (67%), or "cold war" (58%). "Flying disks" was another term commonly used by the media to describe the objects in the late 1940s and early 1950s. He complained that the press misquoted him, picking up the "like a saucer" phrase, and reported it as a "flying saucer". However, several years later Arnold said he had described their movement as a kind of skipping, like a saucer skimming over water. (See Kenneth Arnold for drawing and verbal descriptions.) Another drawing was of a ninth, somewhat larger object with a boomerang or crescent shape, resembling a flying wing aircraft. Arnold initially described and drew a picture of eight of the objects as being thin and flat, circular in the front but truncated in the back and coming to a point. The nine objects Kenneth Arnold reported were not strictly saucer-shaped. Some seventy years later in 1947, the media used the term "flying saucers" to describe Kenneth Arnold's sighting. [3] This may be the first known use of the word "saucer" to describe an unidentified flying object. On January 25, 1878, The Denison Daily News wrote that John Martin, a local farmer, the previous day had reported seeing a large, dark, circular flying object resembling a balloon flying "at wonderful speed," and also used the word "saucer" in describing it. This is echoed in the character of the parson Nathaniel in Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of The War of the Worlds. Noting the variance of the above theories with Christian tradition, a number of conservative Protestant writers (e.g., Hal Lindsey) have suggested that UFOs and their occupants are demonic in origin, intent on seducing humanity into accepting non-Christian doctrines such as evolution. A prominent spokesperson for this trend was Shirley MacLaine, especially in her book and miniseries, Out On a Limb. Many participants in the New Age movement came to believe in alien contact, perhaps through channeling. Another 1970s-era development was the association of UFOs with supernatural subjects such as occultism, cryptozoology, and parapsychology. Many of these theories posit that aliens have been guiding human evolution, an idea taken up earlier by the novel and film 2001: A Space Odyssey. This "ancient astronauts" theory inspired numerous imitators, sequels, and fictional adaptations, including one book (Barry Downing's The Bible and Flying Saucers) which interprets miraculous aerial phenomena in the Bible as records of alien contact. The book argued that aliens have been visiting Earth for thousands of years, which explained UFO-like images from various archeological sources as well as unsolved mysteries (such as the Egyptian pyramids). Another important development in 1970s UFO lore came with the publication of Erich von Däniken's book Chariots of the Gods. Jung's comparison with angelic visions in his article Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies.) This newer, darker model can be seen in the subsequent wave of "alien abduction" literature, and in the background mythos of TV's X-Files. (Cf. Both Strieber and Vallee were led to doubt that these beings were "extraterrestrials" as the term is ordinarily understood, and see more of a connection to elf and fairy lore. The cover of the paperback edition of Communion introduced a standard "grey" alien-head appearance charactierized by a large lozenge-shaped head sharpening to a pointed chin, a small slit for the mouth and large pointed lozenge-shaped eyes canted downwards towards the nose (this was later satirized in Schwa). Strieber, a horror writer, felt that aliens were harassing him and were responsible for "missing time" during which he was subjected to strange experiments. This model was all but overturned during the 1980s mainly in the USA, with the publication of books by Whitley Strieber (beginning with Communion) and Jacques Vallee (Passport to Magonia). By the 1970s, popular sentiment had it that UFOs were alien spacecraft, and that the aliens involved were benevolent, reinforced through movies such as Close Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T., and Klaatu's song Calling Occupants (of Interplanetary Craft), later made popular by Karen Carpenter. I can now reveal that every day, in the USA, our radar instruments capture objects of form and composition unknown to us." [2]. ...For many years I have lived with a secret, in a secrecy imposed on all specialists and astronauts. Cooper stated, "I believe that these extraterrestrial vehicles and their crews are visiting this planet from other planets which obviously are a little more technically advanced than we are here on Earth. McDonald said the incident evidently happened; besides talking to Cooper, he had interviewed the two photographers involved, who corroborated Cooper’s basic story.[1] In 1985 Cooper addressed a United Nations Panel Discussion on UFOs and ETs chaired by then Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim. McDonald’s Case 41 in his 1968 Congressional testimony discussing his list of the best UFO evidence. James E. The incident was Dr. Project Blue Book claimed it was a weather balloon distorted by desert heat. Cooper said he viewed prints of the object before the film was shipped back to Washington. NASA astronaut Gordon Cooper has claimed, (including in his book Leap of Faith), that a classic saucer-shaped aircraft landed at Edwards Air Force Base on May 3, 1957 when he was stationed there, and was photographed by a technical film crew. This was the case with the UFO encounter reported by police sergeant Lonnie Zamora just outside the town of Socorro in New Mexico, which is perhaps the best documented encounter. Others claimed that the main role of the supposed craft was to supervise. Generally speaking, the aliens who were purported to sponsor such groups, claim benevolent purposes such as warning humanity of the dangers of nuclear war or inviting Earth to join an interplanetary federation. The Aetherius Society is an early example; more recent ones include Raël and the Ashtar Command. Beginning in the 1950s, UFO-related spiritual sects began to appear. Arnold's claims subsequently received significant mainstream media and public attention. The UFOs witnessed by Arnold were not, in the strictest sense of the term, saucer-shaped, he described only their movements as being similar to that of a saucer skipping over water, hence the origin of the term flying saucer. He reported seeing nine bright objects, (possibly irregular, glowing components of a meteoric fireball in the process of breaking up) flying at "an incredible speed" at an altitude of 10,000 feet (3,000 m) towards nearby Mount Adams. Marine C-46 transport plane. Arnold was helping to search for the wreckage of a downed U.S. The post World War II phase in UFOs began with a claimed sighting by American businessman Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947, near Mount Rainier, Washington. In 1946, there was a wave of "ghost rockets" seen over Scandinavia. In Europe during World War II, "Foo-fighters" (luminous balls that followed airplanes) were reported by both Allied and Axis pilots. There were several reports of unidentified aircrafts in the Scandinavian countries in the 1930s. However, Roerich did not express an opinion as to what he thought it might be, surrounding passages discuss the technology of ancient civilizations as recounted by Theosophical lore. In his travelogue Altai-Himalaya, Russian artist and mystic Nicholas Roerich reported sighting "an oval form with a shiny surface" flying high above Amdo, eastern Tibet in 1926. These phantom airship scares are detailed in The Scareship Mystery edited by Nigel Watson (DOMRA, 2000). Most of these scares can be attributed to the misperception of stars, the work of hoaxers and their promotion by the media. During the First World War there were mystery aircraft scares in South Africa, Canada, Britain and the USA. Airships and mystery aircraft were also seen over the USA in 1909 and 1910 and were thought to be the creation of Wallace Tillinghast, though this seems very doubtful. The same fears generated a similar scare in New Zealand and Australia in 1909. These were thought to be German Zeppelins spying out the land prior to invasion. Mystery airships were seen throughout Britain in 1909 and from 1912 to 1913. In 1896-97, unidentified "Mystery airships" were reported in the United States, though some of these reports are now known to have been deliberate hoaxes. This event was witnessed by hundreds of people, as was a similar event in Basel in 1566, where numerous "flaming" and black globes appeared. On April 14, 1561 the skies over Nuremberg were filled with a multitude of objects, including cylinders and spheres, seemingly engaged in an aerial battle. An appropriate report was made for the emperor, and other appearances occurred in Japan in 1361. In 1235 the army of Oritsume in Japan saw mysterious lights in the sky. Ancient Roman records occasionally mention "shields" and even "armies" seen in the sky. The army of Alexander the Great in 329 BC saw "two silver shields" in the sky. Strange unidentified apparitions in the sky and on the ground have been reported throughout history. . However, similar groups of notables are equally skeptical and often dismiss such statements as conspiracy theories, maintaining that the evidence is unconvincing and that the subject in general is pseudoscience. Such allegations have been made by Ufologists as well as notable high-ranking military officers, government officials, astronauts, scientists, and other notable ETH supporters. There is an unproven contention that incontrovertible proof probably does exist but is being withheld from the public by world governments, perhaps out of fear of widespread panic and social disruption that might result from disclosure of such information. However, no incontrovertible physical evidence of the existence of such spacecraft has been presented, though many forms of disputed physical evidence do exist in the public domain. However, the original working term UFO has largely become popularized in the public mind with the notion that UFOs might be extraterrestrial spacecraft (the ETH or Extraterrestrial hypothesis). A number of conventional and unconventional theories have been proposed to explain UFOs. (USAF document). Such characteristics, as noted by early Air Force studies dating back to 1947, might include unconventional shape, high speed and/or acceleration, high maneuverability, extreme rate of climb, absence of sound and/or trail, formation flying, and/or evasion upon pursuit. By the stricter definitions, something must remain unidentified and have anomalous characteristics to be classified as a UFO. Air Force adopted a similar official definition in 1954, saying a UFO is "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." In addition, investigation was stated to be for the purposes of national security and to ascertain "technical aspects." (USAF document). The U.S. Air Force consultant and UFO proponent, as "the reported perception of an object or light seen in the sky or upon the land the appearance, trajectory, and general dynamic and luminescent behaviour of which do not suggest a logical, conventional explanation and which is not only mystifying to the original percipients but remains unidentified after close scrutiny of all available evidence by persons who are technically capable of making a common sense identification, if one is possible.". Allen Hynek, late astronomer, U.S. J. A fuller definition was given by Dr. A UFO or Unidentified Flying Object is simply defined as any object or optical phenomenon observed in the sky which cannot be identified, even after being thoroughly investigated by qualified people. More than one explanation--various combinations of the above. The Man-made Craft Hypothesis (see Military flying saucers). The Earthlights/Tectonic Stress Hypothesis. ball lightning. The Natural Explanation Hypothesis, e.g. The Psychological-Social Hypothesis. The Interdimensional Hypothesis. The Paranormal/Occult Hypothesis. The Extraterrestrial Visitation Hypothesis. Aurora borealis (northern lights). Reflected light (especially through broken clouds). Atmospheric inversion layers. Ball lightning. Earth lights (luminous electrical events from low-level earthquakes and tectonic-geological phenomena.). Hot ionized gas (natural or man-made). Reflections from atmospheric inversion layers. Swarms of flying insects. Flocks of birds. Near or large meteors. Meteor Swarms. Comets. Unusual weather conditions (such as lenticular cloud formations, noctilucent clouds, rainbow effects, and high-altitude ice crystals). The moon, stars, and planets (for example, the cusps of the rising crescent moon in the tropics, and Venus at maximum brightness). Jiffy Fire Starters. Deliberate hoaxes. Searchlights. Lasers aimed at the clouds. Fireworks. Hang-gliders. Model aircraft. Kites. Rockets and rocket launches. Blimps. Hovering aircraft (such as helicopters). Artificial earth satellites (and particularly satellite flares, which can be surprisingly bright). Advertising planes. Unconventional aircraft or advanced technology (i.e., the SR-71 Blackbird or the B-2 Stealth bomber). Flashing landing lights of conventional aircraft. Military aircraft. Balloons (meteorological or passenger). The human brain then creates the illusion of a spacecraft based on this misinterpretation, which then fools the observer.". Reentering space debris or meteors may appear as a string of lights, which can be misinterpreted as lights coming from windows of a spacecraft. Even police and other reliable witnesses can easily be fooled by sightings of stars and planets. Similarly, some witnesses believed that the UFO was “following them” even though the celestial body was actually stationary. In 49 of the UFO reports caused by celestial bodies, the witness’ estimated distance to the UFO ranged from 200 feet to 125 miles (60 m to 200 km). Distortions in the atmosphere can cause celestial bodies to appear to “dart up and down,” “execute loops and figure eights,” “meander in a square pattern,” or even “zigzag.” This helps explain why celestial bodies can so easily fool observers. Statistics: 28% of the UFO reports were bright stars or planets; 1.7% were the tip of the crescent moon; 18% were advertising plane banners (usually seen edge-on rather than the face-on); and 9% were fireballs and reentering space debris. "Out of 1,307 cases: 1,194 (91.4%) had clear prosaic (non-extraterrestrial) explanations; 93 (7.1%) had possible prosaic explanations; and 20 (1.5%) were unexplained. [27]. James Harder as intense magnetic fields from the UFO causing the Faraday effect. Misc: Recorded electromagnetic emissions, such as microwaves detected in the well-known 1957 RB-47 surveillance aircraft case, which was also a visual and radar case; [26] polarization rings observed around a UFO by a scientist, theorized by Dr. The 1964 Socorro incident also left metal traces, analyzed by NASA. Actual hard physical evidence cases, such as 1957, Ubatuba, Brazil, magnesium fragments analyzed in the Condon Report and by others. [25]. Remote radiation detection, some noted in FBI and CIA documents occurring over government nuclear installations at Los Alamos National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 1950, also reported by Project Blue Book director Ed Ruppelt in his book. Electromagnetic interference effects, including stalled cars, power black-outs, radio/TV interference, magnetic compass deflections, and aircraft navigation, communication, and engine disruption.[24]. Biological effects on plants such as increased or decreased growth, germination effects on seeds, and blown-out stem nodes (usually associated with physical trace cases or crop circles). Such cases can and have been analyzed using forensic science techniques. So-called Animal/Cattle Mutilation cases, that some feel are also part of the UFO phenomenon. [23]. One such case dates back to 1886, a Venezuelan incident reported in Scientific American magazine. Physiological effects on people and animals including temporary paralysis, skin burns and rashes, corneal burns, and symptoms resembling radiation poisoning, such as the Cash-Landrum incident in 1980. [20] Catalogs of several thousand such cases have been compiled, particularly by researcher Ted Phillips.[21][22]. Another less than 2 weeks later, in January 1981, occurred in Trans-en-Provence and was investigated by GEPAN, then France's official government UFO-investigation agency. A well-known example from December 1980 was the USAF Rendlesham Forest Incident in England. Height 611 UFO Incident or the 1964 Lonnie Zamora's Socorro, New Mexico encounter, considered one of the most inexplicable of the USAF Project Blue Book cases). See, e.g. Landing physical trace evidence, including ground impressions, burned and/or dessicated soil, burned and broken foliage, magnetic anomalies, increased radiation levels, and metallic traces. Recorded gravimetric and magnetic disturbances (extremely rare). Recorded visual spectrograms (extremely rare) — (see Spectrometer). A library of Star Cruisers has been compiled complete with links to the official government versions of the images. Images recorded by SOHO and other Sun watching probes. Photograpic evidence, including still photos, movie film, and video, including some in infrared spectrum (rare). One such recent example were the mass sightings of large, silent, low-flying black triangles in 1989 and 1990 over Belgium. These are often considered among the best cases since they usually involve trained military personnel, simultaneous visual sightings, and aircraft intercepts. Radar contact and tracking, sometimes from multiple sites. 5% of respondents admitted to puzzling sightings; only 10% of these said they had reported their sightings. only 3% for UFOs being actual alien craft. Probabilities of conventional explanations such as hoax or familiar/unfamiliar craft or natural phenomena were rated at 13% to 23% vs. Skepticism against the extraterrestrial hypothesis ran high. Younger scientists were more willing to investigate than older ones. 68% who had spent over 300 hours. Only 29% of those having spent less than an hour reading about the subject felt further investigation was warranted vs. Lack of knowledge strongly contributed to skepticism and lack of willingness to investigate. 80% expressed a willingness to contribute to the resolution of the UFO question, though only 13% of these could think of a way to do so. only 20% who felt they definitely or probably were not. 53% felt UFOs were definitely or probably a topic worthy of further scientific study vs. Air Force in the 1950's or the 1960's Condon Commission?. Why focus on only poor cases when there are also many high-quality, unexplainable ones, even when investigated by trained scientists, such as those involved with the Battelle Institute investigation for the U.S. Many sightings, for example, are not of distant "lights in the sky," which might easily be simple misidentifications, but are of structured objects at close range, often with associated physical effects and evidence (see below). Some arguments show a lack of knowledge of the available evidence. Why would aliens necessarily make their presence unambiguously known? Why would alien interests necessarily be restricted to simple physical surveys? Why assume interstellar travel to be nearly impossible, basically an assumption that alien science and technology would not be that much more advanced than that of present-day humans?. Many of the skeptical arguments rest on hidden or presumed assumptions about alien intentions and technology. The general sensationalization surrounding the subject, including the perception that many amateur researchers lack proper scientific training and instead have a "readiness to believe". The many circumstances that can lead to misidentification of ordinary objects seen at a distance in the sky — a scientific, skeptical approach can cast reasonable doubt on the "strangeness" of cases that appear at first glance to be very impressive. The unreliability or scientific inadequacy of many reports. Lack of indisputable physical evidence. Arguments that aliens could not be here because of the distances and energies required for interstellar travel in a reasonable period of time, according to present-day understanding of physical law. home page. Education and lobbying group that runs The Disclosure Project, an effort to get government disclosure on UFOs and other topics, claiming to currently have over 400 government, military, and intelligence witnesses. Steven Greer. Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CSETI)[7] (1990- ): Maryland based, founded and run by the controversial Dr. home page. based group founded and headed by political activist/lobbyist Stephen Bassett, pushing for government UFO disclosure. Paradigm Research Group (PRG) & Extraterrestrial Phenomena Political Action Committee (X-PPAC) (1996- ): Small, Washington D.C. home page. Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) (~1978- ): Small, Arizona based research and judicially oriented organization filing many FOIA applications and lawsuits to declassify and release government UFO information. National Institute of Discovery Science (NIDS) (1996-present). Fund for UFO Research (FUFOR) (1976-present). Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) (1973-present). Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) (1969-present). National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) (1956-1980). Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) (1952-1988). About 30% of the cases examined by the Condon Committee itself were "well-documented but unexplainable" and formed the "hard core of the UFO controversy." They recommended a moderate level, ongoing scientific study of UFOs. The conclusions were quickly endorsed by the National Academy of Science (NAS), but a more detailed review by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) criticized the NAS position and the Condon Report conclusions, which they noted did not match the actual data. The Condon Committee (1966 to 1969), commissioned by Project Blue Book while under pressure from a Congressional inquiry after a new wave of sightings in 1965 and 1966, was a landmark but still controversial study which supported the misidentification-delusion-hoax explanation for UFO reports, and furthermore argued that no available evidence warranted further scientific study. The report's conclusions have been offered as a possible motive for governments to cover up evidence of extraterrestrial life. The study was noteworthy for its conclusions regarding possible future contact with an extraterrestrial civilization, which they felt would likely be highly disruptive: "...societies sure of their own place in the universe have disintegrated when confronted by a superior society..." Among groups cited as likely having trouble adapting to the new reality were religious fundamentalists and many scientists. The Brookings Report was a study commisioned by NASA in 1960 from the Brookings Institution. Also six studied characteristics (speed, duration, color, etc.) were found to be different between knowns and unknowns at a high level of statistical significance. 18%). Their statistics indicated that 22% of the reports remained unexplained even after stringent analysis and the highest quality reports were twice as likely to remain unexplained than the poorest quality (35% vs. 14 was a massive scientific statistical study of all Blue Book UFO reports to date conducted by the Battelle Memorial Institute at behest of the Air Force from 1951 to 1954. Project Blue Book Special Report No. This protocol is allegedly still in effect. The alleged intent of this government program, as indicated on many UFO-related websites and other UFO conspiracy sources, is to ridicule or discredit any who had seen UFOs or had alien encounters. Thereafter, unexplained cases plummeted from over 20% down to 3%. Immediately after the Robertson Panel, Project Blue Book was downgraded in status by the USAF, directed to withhold information on unexplained cases from the public, and also ordered to reduce the number of unexplained cases to a minimum. They also recommended spying on civilian UFO organizations because of their influence on the public. After brief study, the panel concluded that most UFOs were prosaic, and furthermore suggested a public relations campaign using celebrities, authority figures, and media giants like Walt Disney Corporation to reduce public interest. The Robertson Panel was organized by the Central Intelligence Agency in late 1952, in response to a wave of UFO sightings, especially in the Washington DC area, which included highly-publicized radar contacts and jet intercepts. Ruppelt they thought the fireballs were alien probes from spaceships orbiting Earth. But at the same time, scientists at Los Alamos told new Project Blue Book chief Edward J. In 1951, over LaPaz's objections, Twinkle concluded the fireballs might be some natural phenomenon. Upon urging of the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, a year later the Air Force set up a small observation program called Project Twinkle. Based on observed object characteristics, LaPaz quickly concluded the fireballs weren't natural and thought they might be Russian spy devices. Lincoln LaPaz, astronomer and noted meteor expert, investigated for the Air Force, with extensive help from military intelligence and the FBI. Dr. In December 1948, mysterious Green Fireballs were sighted over sensitive military and government research facilities in New Mexico, such as Los Alamos National Laboratory. Since Project Blue Book was dissolved in 1969, the United States government claims that they have had no formal study of UFO reports. According to Ruppelt, highly influential Pentagon generals were frustrated with the UFO debunking of Project Grudge, resulting in it being replaced by Blue Book. Ruppelt, referred to the previous era of Grudge as the "Dark Ages" of USAF UFO studies. Grudge was active until early 1952, when it too was renamed and upgraded in status by the Pentagon, becoming Project Blue Book. In 1956, the first director of Blue Book, Edward J. In late 1948 Project Sign was renamed Project Grudge. Vandenberg ordered the report destroyed citing lack of physical proof. USAF Chief of Staff General Hoyt S. Sign produced an "Estimate of the Situation" in late summer, 1948, concluding that the flying saucers were not only real but likely interplanetary in origin. Twining's memo resulted in the United States Air Force founding Project Sign in late 1947, the first publicly acknowledged government UFO study. Both the Air Intelligence and Material Command studies concluding saucer reality were classified and not publicly acknowledged for many years. Twining's memo of September 23, 1947, likewise concluded the craft were real, further defined their described characteristics, and urged that the subject should be treated seriously, including a formal investigation by multiple government agencies besides the Air Force. In response to the earlier study, the engineering and intelligence divisions of the Air Force Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, under the direction of General Nathan Twining, further reviewed the data. From July 9 to July 30, 1947, Army Air Force Intelligence studied the 16 best UFO sightings of the previous months, mostly those reported by military and civilian pilots, and concluded that the "flying saucer situation" was neither imaginary nor adequately explained as natural phenomena: "something is really flying around.". summary of report. government. They also accused world governments of covering up this information, with strongest criticism directed at the U.S. The report concluded that UFOs were physically real, under control of intelligent beings, and probably extraterrestrial in origin. Other contributors included various generals, admirals, aerospace engineers and scientists (including from SEPRA), and the national police superintendant. The report was prefaced by General Bernard Norlain of the Air Force, former Director of IHEDN, and began with a preamble by André Lebeau, former President of CNES. The study was carried out primarily by an independent group of former "auditors" at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN (the same group whose recommendations two decades before led to the formation of GEPAN), and by experts from various fields. COMETA (in English, "Committee for in-depth studies") was a semi-official committee that began investigation into UFOs in 1995 and issued a final report in July 1999, titled "UFOs and Defense: What must we be prepared for?" Before its public release, the report was sent to French President Jacques Chirac and to Prime Minister Lionel Jospin. 14). (see Project Blue Book Special Report No. (description and links) A 1979 GEPAN report stated that about a quarter of over 1600 closely studied UFO cases defied explanation, echoing results from the USAF's initial UFO studies from 1947 to about 1954. It devised a precise analytical methodology and accumulated a database of more than 2200 different cases, with some 6000 eyewitness accounts and approximately 100 sightings from aircraft. It was set up to help civilian and military authorities understand the precise nature of the UFO phenomenon. GEPAN/SEPRA was a unit of the national space agency of France (CNES) and was based at the CNES technical center in Toulouse. In 1988 it was reorganized into SEPRA (the Service d'Expertise des Phénomènes de Rentrées Atmosphériques) and discontinued in 2004. GEPAN (Group d'Etude des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-Identifiés) was the official French UFO study agency, started in 1977. Cigar-shaped "craft" with lighted windows (Meteor fireballs are sometimes reported this way). Large triangular "craft" or triangular light pattern. Rapidly-moving lights or lights with apparent ability to rapidly change direction — the earliest mention of their motion was given as "saucers skipping on water." Disc-shaped craft are sometimes reported to move in an irregular or "wobbly" manner at low speeds. (day and night). Saucer, toy-top, or disk-shaped "craft" without visible or audible propulsion. |